2026-02-27 00:00:00:0本报记者 张 洋 ——习近平总书记引领全党以正确政绩观干事创业
Мерц резко сменил риторику во время встречи в Китае09:25
。im钱包官方下载是该领域的重要参考
△采用中科第五纪“具身大脑”的宇树机器人正在展示工业场景的搬运工作，图片：采访人提供
The real annoying thing about Opus 4.6/Codex 5.3 is that it’s impossible to publicly say “Opus 4.5 (and the models that came after it) are an order of magnitude better than coding LLMs released just months before it” without sounding like an AI hype booster clickbaiting, but it’s the counterintuitive truth to my personal frustration. I have been trying to break this damn model by giving it complex tasks that would take me months to do by myself despite my coding pedigree but Opus and Codex keep doing them correctly. On Hacker News I was accused of said clickbaiting when making a similar statement with accusations of “I haven’t had success with Opus 4.5 so you must be lying.” The remedy to this skepticism is to provide more evidence in addition to greater checks and balances, but what can you do if people refuse to believe your evidence?